Native Markets leads USDH race — Native Markets has emerged as the frontrunner in the Hyperliquid USDH contest, with validators backing its native issuance approach.

Tether launches USAT — Tether announced plans for USAT, a U.S.-domiciled, GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoin, with Anchorage as issuer and Cantor Fitzgerald managing reserves.

Who Will Print Hyperliquid’s Dollar? The USDH Winner’s Curse

In the late 1990s, Enron was the star of deregulated energy markets. The Houston giant bid aggressively for power contracts, locking in distribution rights across the U.S. The economics looked brilliant on paper, but Enron’s contracts were so thin that there was no margin left to sustain them. Textbook winner’s curse.

The race for Hyperliquid’s USDH, its native stablecoin, carries some resemblance. Issuers are promising 95–100% of reserve yield back to the ecosystem just to win the ticker. The prize is real: control of the “house dollar” on crypto’s fastest-growing derivatives exchange.

What the Race Is

Hyperliquid has reserved the USDH ticker and asked its validators to pick a single issuer. Proposals spell out yield splits, how USDH will be minted, redemption mechanics, and ecosystem incentives.

Winning doesn’t mean monopoly. USDC, USDT, and others will still trade. But USDH will be the default quote and settlement currency on Hyperliquid. That’s why issuers are offering extraordinary concessions: whoever controls USDH controls liquidity gravity.

How It’s Unfolding

• Early September: Hyperliquid unveils the process—validators will choose USDH’s issuer in the next network upgrade.

• Sept 9–10: Proposals roll in. Paxos revises its bid, Frax pivots to native issuance, Native Markets emphasizes enforceable splits.

• Sept 11: Ethena withdraws, saying it isn’t “HL-native” and will focus on its hUSDe and HIP-3 suite.

• Sept 14: Winner announced. Validator signaling and betting markets point to Native Markets as the frontrunner, with odds as high as 97% in its favor.

The Bidders

What to Watch Next

Native Markets is likely to win. Validators value its HL-native design and enforceable splits. Ethena is out, Paxos feels too off-chain, Agora’s zero-take bid looks unsustainable. But the bigger question is what happens after the vote.

• How the validator vote is enforced and executed.

• Whether splits and audit promises survive contact with reality and regulation.

• If USDH actually displaces USDC pairs—or just becomes a ceremonial ticker with little flow.

Say What — Native Markets?

Native Markets is a newcomer with no prior experience issuing fiat-backed stablecoins, emerging directly out of the USDH process. They present themselves as a Hyperliquid-first project, proposing to mint USDH natively on HyperEVM, the chain’s execution layer.

Unlike Paxos or Agora, Native doesn’t rely on an off-chain board or regulated trust. Instead, their model leans on Hyperliquid’s validator governance: validators select the issuer, and the reserve-yield economics are meant to be transparently enforced on-chain through smart contracts.

Why It Matters

Issuers willing to bid away their economics, but still lose: Proposals route almost all reserve yield back to HL or its users. That’s distribution power eclipsing issuer margins—exactly what we argued last week: rails extract the value, issuers become commodities.

Sovereignty vs. dependence: Paxos offers PayPal distribution and a U.S. regulatory umbrella. Native Markets offers Hyperliquid-first alignment. This is a referendum: does HL want Wall Street gloss or crypto-native control?

Precedent for the industry: Other dApps /ecosystems are watching. The playbook—auction the ticker, codify splits, route yield to community funds—could become the norm for “house dollars.”

Were the Bids Even Sustainable and Who Wins?

This is where the winner’s curse bites, particularly for the more TradFi players. Running a stablecoin business involves compliance, audits, custody, liquidity support, integrations. Those costs are usually funded from the Treasury yield spread. If you give away 95–100% of it, the math turns thin.

Some issuers may subsidize from elsewhere (PayPal for Paxos, Frax’s treasury, Sky’s balance sheet). Others may bet on optionality: codify zero take now, sneak in fees later once USDH is entrenched. Either way, these are not fat-margin businesses. The “win” could look like Enron’s power contracts: glorious on distribution, hollow on profit.

In the end, the real winner may be Hyperliquid itself. The chain has orchestrated a spectacle of proposals, withdrawals, validator politicking, and billion-dollar promises that rivals any governance drama in crypto. Validators are entertained, issuers are bending over backwards, and the community gets showered with yield.

Whatever the outcome, Hyperliquid walks away with a phenomenal deal: a native dollar, validated by competition, subsidized by issuers, and delivered with all the pyrotechnics of a DeFi soap opera.

Tether’s All-American Red Herring

Tether has unveiled $USAT, a flag-waving all-American, U.S.-compliant stablecoin designed to meet every requirement of the new Genius Act: cash and Treasuries only, GAAP audits, OFAC enforcement, U.S. domicile, and went as far as to appoint Trump’s former digital asset advisor, Bo Hines, as its CEO.

On the surface, it looks like Tether’s pivot into compliance. But to understand what’s really happening, let’s consider the three worlds where stablecoins operate.

1. The compliant zone. This is where U.S. institutions live — banks, fintechs, globally-regulated funds. They already prefer Circle’s USDC, PayPal’s PYUSD, or eventually bank-issued tokens. Tether has never competed here; adding USAT may give it a seat at the table, but it’s late to the party.
   

2. The grey zone. This is Tether’s sweet spot, and where most of its trading volume comes from. Offshore exchanges in Asia and MENA, OTC brokers in Hong Kong and Dubai, dollar-hungry savers in Argentina and Turkey. In these markets, demand for a digital dollar is real, and U.S. rules are too rigid to accommodate it. USDT dominates here because it’s flexible: willing to serve markets where wires don’t reach, but not so reckless as to ignore real criminal risk.
   

3. The dark zone. Truly illicit finance. Chainalysis reports that stablecoins accounted for 63% of illicit crypto transaction volume last year. Here, Tether has shown it does comply, freezing addresses linked to terrorism, hacks, or sanctioned actors. Contrary to myth, USDT is not lawless: it cooperates with law enforcement when needed.

The moat is the grey zone. If Tether forced USDT into full U.S. compliance, it would lose this distribution advantage overnight. Mandatory KYC, proactive OFAC, and regulator sign-off on counterparties would cut off the very exchanges and brokers that make USDT indispensable across emerging markets.

The reserves' story just makes the pill even harder to swallow. According to its June audit, $30B (16–18% of Tether’s $162B reserves) sit in non-compliant assets. Replacing them with Treasuries would slash yields by 0.3–0.7% portfolio-wide, or $0.5–1.1B in lost annual profit. That’s 10–20% of earnings gone, and worse if Treasury rates fall.

So yes, USAT is a new coin “built for Americans.” But is it really? Americans already have the dollar for payments. Institutions already have USDC. Maybe USAT will power its way to becoming trading collateral, backed by Tether’s much larger war chest ($13B+ reserve profits vs. Circle’s $658M before distribution payments). Or maybe, as critics argue, USAT is just a shiny object for Washington, while USDT remains the real business, keeps markets where dollars are needed most and heavy-handed regulators can’t reach.

Other Stories Worth Your Time

Nasdaq files for tokenized securities — Nasdaq submitted a proposal to the SEC to list tokenized securities alongside traditional equities.

VanEck plans Hyperliquid staking ETF / European ETP — VanEck will file for a U.S. spot-staking ETF and a European ETP for Hyperliquid’s HYPE token, with potential ETF profits used for HYPE buybacks.

Circle expands integrations — Circle added USDC minting on Yala (for BTC holders), integrated with Canton (USDC + USYC for institutions), and partnered with Plume (RWA + BTC flows).

Broadridge’s $300B/day repo ops — Broadridge disclosed its Digital Ledger Repo system processes $300B daily via the Canton Network, the largest blockchain finance operation to date.

Figure IPOs — Blockhain lender Figure raised just under $800M in its IPO, pricing at $25 per share and trading up 40% on debut

LitFinancial launches litUSD — Mortgage lender LitFinancial introduced litUSD, a cash-backed stablecoin for mortgage settlement and treasury ops.

Christie’s shutters digital art department — Christie’s is closing its digital art/NFT division, folding sales into mainstream art categories after weak results.

Brickken coalition proposes ERC-7943 — A coalition of RWA platforms led by Brickken and OpenZeppelin introduced ERC-7943, a standard for institutional-grade tokenization.